Why are judges speaking out? How are they responding to the threats on the judiciary and rule of law? What can lawyers and members of the community do to support the continued independence of the judiciary and the rule of law?
Why are judges speaking out? How are they responding to the threats on the judiciary and rule of law? What can lawyers and members of the community do to support the continued independence of the judiciary and the rule of law?
President Trump issued an Executive Order last March imposing punitive measures against Perkins Coie law firm for its past legal work, which was challenged by the firm with support from over 500 law firms, nonprofits, and law professors; a federal judge struck down the order as unconstitutional in May. Join us for a discussion with key lawyers involved in the litigation and a legal profession expert about why so many lawyers opposed the order, how they found common ground, and what obligations lawyers have to oppose such orders.
What is a transnational mass tort? How are these cases currently being handled? Do we need an international court of civil justice for these cases?
In this episode, we discussed mass tort bankruptcies with The Honorable William J. Lafferty, III, Professor Andrew Bradt, and Leslie A. Brueckner. Learn about the controversies, impact on plaintiffs, past cases, and future expectations.
In this episode, we discussed some of the legal issues that arose for homeowners and others with injuries following a disaster with leading fire litigation attorney Gerald Singleton of Singleton Schreiber and Michal Meiler of Ver Ploeg & Marino.
This episode discusses the post-Chevron deference to agency interpretations of the law, and the implications of Loper Bright with Matt Wessler of Gupta Wessler, Berkeley Law Professor Sharon Jacobs, and Judge Jeremy Fogel (Ret.), Executive Director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute.
This episode discusses the latest developments in mandatory arbitration with F. Paul Bland and Professor Myriam Gilles.
This episode features a discussion of the latest developments in gun liability litigation with Alinor Sterling, counsel for the plaintiffs in the Sandy Hook Litigation, and Robert S. Peck , President of the Center for Constitutional Litigation.
AI is changing the way civil litigation is practiced. What are the implications for the evaluation and presentation of evidence? Is the use of AI generated evidence consistent with the Rules of Evidence?
What are the cutting-edge issues in the courts on social media, privacy, and free speech? What’s moving in Congress and state legislatures? And what’s on the radar for state and federal action?
What are the most important considerations in evaluating potential civil litigation? How do litigators and litigation funders assess cases differently?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co raises new questions about the reach of personal jurisdiction. How has Mallory changed corporate exposure to jurisdiction? What are the remaining limits on personal jurisdiction?
This short webinar will feature renowned trial lawyer James Brosnahan discussing his new book “Justice at Trial.”
What is the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review? How and why is that power currently being challenged?
Join Jonathan Lowy and Professor Heidi Li Feldman for a discussion about the latest developments in gun liability litigation.
Join Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) and Professor Amanda Tyler as they explore questions related to ethics, transparency, and accountability of US Supreme Court Justices.
This half hour webinar focused on the role of civil litigation in the movement to address climate change.
This two-hour webinar explored the ethical issues raised by increased attacks on the independence and legitimacy of the courts. Recently, these attacks have come most noticeably from the political branches, but are also increasingly seen from practitioners and at times from the judges themselves.
This webinar explored the dramatic growth in the use of mandatory, binding arbitration in the United States.
This edition of “Conversations on Civil Justice” featured a conversation with John C. Manly, the nation’s preeminent attorney representing victims of sexual abuse and assault and lead counsel for the Olympic gymnasts and the students in the USC, UCLA, and Michigan cases. Mr. Manly was joined by CJRI’s Richard Jolly and Berkeley Law J.D. Candidate Jenna Forster.
Professor Sergio Campos and Ellen Noble explore whether bankruptcy proceedings in mass torts raise access to justice concerns.
This two-hour webinar explored the ethical issues raised by increased attacks on the independence and legitimacy of the courts. Recently, these attacks have come most noticeably from the political branches, but are also increasingly seen from practitioners and at times from the judges themselves.
In this half-hour long webinar, Richard Jolly moderates a discussion about civil remedies for Police Brutality with policing scholar Jeannine Bell and human rights lawyer Paul Hoffman.
In this half-hour long webinar, Richard Jolly moderates a discussion with Valerie Hans and Bob Clifford, who discuss the impact COVID-19 has had on jury trials, as well as practical and technological approaches for addressing the issues faced by the courts.