calendardigital-marketingexec-ed-logo-whiteit-solutionslocation-dotweb-developmentplyr-airplayplyr-captions-offplyr-captions-onplyr-downloadplyr-enter-fullscreenplyr-exit-fullscreenplyr-fast-forwardplyr-logo-vimeoplyr-logo-youtubeplyr-mutedplyr-pauseplyr-pipplyr-playplyr-restartplyr-rewindplyr-settingsplyr-volume

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co raises new questions about the reach of personal jurisdiction. How has Mallory changed corporate exposure to jurisdiction? What are the remaining limits on personal jurisdiction? This webinar featured Ashely Keller and Zina Bash (both of Keller Postman), who argued the Mallory case in the Supreme Court on behalf of the plaintiffs, along with Cassandra Robertson (Director, Center for Professional Ethics at Case Western Reserve University, School of Law) discussing the state of personal jurisdiction after Mallory. Judge Jeremy D. Fogel (Ret.) (Berkeley Judicial Institute) will moderate. Cosponsored with the Civil Justice Research Initiative, with support from AAJ’s Robert L. Habush Endowment, and the Berkeley Judicial Institute.

Already have access?

Watch Webinar

Your Credit is Waiting!

You’ve already watched this webinar. Don’t forget to fill out the self-attestation form to receive your free MCLE credit.

Redeem CLE Credit

Recorded on February 9, 2024

Guests

Headshot of Zina Bash

Zina Bash

Partner at Keller Postman LLC

Headshot of Jeremy Fogel

Jeremy Fogel

Executive Director, Berkeley Judicial Institute at Berkeley Law

Headshot of Ashley Keller

Ashley Keller

Partner at Keller Postman LLC

Headshot of Cassandra Robertson

Cassandra Robertson

Director, Center for Professional Ethics at Case Western Reserve University, School of Law