The Implications of Nestle v. Doe
Guests: Beth Van Schaack and Paul Hoffman
Guests: Beth Van Schaack and Paul Hoffman
In this half-hour webinar, Professors Paul Hoffman (UC Irvine School of Law) and Beth Van Schaack (Stanford Law) discuss the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Nestle v. Doe for human rights litigation in U.S. courts.
Already have access? Sign in
You’ve already watched this webinar. Don’t forget to fill out the self-attestation form to receive your free MCLE credit.
Redeem CLE CreditBy completing this form, you acknowledge that you have watched the recorded presentation in its entirety and are therefore eligible to receive the specified MCLE credit. The information below must match the information provided in the Free CLE Credit form.
Recorded on August 20, 2021
If you require captioning to access a pre-recorded event on our site, please contact executive@law.
Notifications