calendardigital-marketingexec-ed-logo-whiteit-solutionslocation-dotuc-berkeley-lawweb-developmentplyr-airplayplyr-captions-offplyr-captions-onplyr-downloadplyr-enter-fullscreenplyr-exit-fullscreenplyr-fast-forwardplyr-logo-vimeoplyr-logo-youtubeplyr-mutedplyr-pauseplyr-pipplyr-playplyr-restartplyr-rewindplyr-settingsplyr-volume

The Implications of Nestle v. Doe

Guests: Beth Van Schaack and Paul Hoffman

Summary

In this half-hour webinar, Professors Paul Hoffman (UC Irvine School of Law) and Beth Van Schaack (Stanford Law) discuss the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Nestle v. Doe for human rights litigation in U.S. courts.

Get Access

Already have access?

Watch Webinar

Your Credit is Waiting!

You’ve already watched this webinar. Don’t forget to fill out the self-attestation form to receive your free MCLE credit.

Redeem CLE Credit

Recorded on August 20, 2021
If you require captioning to access a pre-recorded event on our site, please contact executive@law.berkeley.edu or (510) 646-1655. It typically takes 7-10 business days for captioning to be provided.